George Huxley s Brave New World - 869 Words

There can only be the powerful where there is the weak; without flaw, there is no such thing as aptness. Authority is identified through triumph and attainment, while outlining a structured classification of supremacy. Humans discriminate against unethical eminences thus isolating a domain of antagonism. Grievous power blossoms from the heart of centralism only to conceptualize the inexorable weakness which follows; the destruction of the individual. Aldous Huxley, an English novelist and philosopher, writes about the effects of a fictional world â€Å"under the iron curtain†. His inventive novel, Brave New World, evaluates the incompatibility between the savage and human which possess dangerous clashes to a community with resilient†¦show more content†¦The scene where the director is ‘educating’ the future generation of the World State, he emphasizes the importance of this propaganda technique as, â€Å"The greatest moralizing and socializing force o f all time.† These influential phrases are presented to the youth during sleeping hours. In addition to the way the overlord, Hitler, would give his most moving, promotional speeches in the late hours of the day to increase the authoritative power of the address onto the individuals who were viewing. Discrimination inside the World State occurs in few forms. Huxley prioritized the elimination of colored skin inside of the upper class generation of the World State citizens. Similarly, Hitler performed mass extermination of Jews during his reign, resulting in the ‘pure’ race. Another form representing the resentment against individuals with non-pure skin, demonstrating totalitarianism. John, a prime specimen of savagery, grasps the reasoning behind his stay in the World State, to be observed. In this scene, he refuses to be objectified by a crowd of paramount individuals. â€Å"The men were furious at having been tricked into behaving politely to this insignifican t fellow with the unsavory reputation and the heretical opinions. The higher their position in the hierarchy, the deeper their resentment.† (Pg. 173).